Search for: "STEVEN T. O"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
Kennedy only dissented once across his first 30 votes and didn’t author a single dissent in those instances. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
The case was assigned to District Judge Judge William T. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
In the past, Constand’s lawyer said Jackson isn’t telling the truth. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
In the past, Constand’s lawyer said Jackson isn’t telling the truth. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:44 am
Judge Steven T. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
At Vox, German Lopez remarks that “[t]he problem with Stevens’s proposal is that the barrier to passing new gun control laws isn’t legal but political. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:55 pm
In contrast, Justice William O. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Judge Watford concludes that prior statements for rebuttal don’t have to address all of the defense theories: it is enough that the statements properly went to one of them (here, the theory that K.C. was coached). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am
Four different justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer – would have ruled that courts can review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
But it can’t be unconstitutional for the largest group of voters to win elections. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
In more recent years that was Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and then Kennedy. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Opponents of birth control insisted that the issue was simple: “If a woman didn’t want to get pregnant, then she shouldn’t do anything that might get her pregnant. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:14 pm
As Matt Levine noted in his March 14, 2018 Bloomberg article about the SEC’s enforcement action (here), “The problem with launching a blood-test machine that doesn’t work isn’t just that you swindle the investors who funded the machine’s development. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
New York State Dep’t of Taxation & Fin., finding that contracts with in-state nonemployees who refer customers for compensation constitute substantial nexus.[2] Twenty-one states have adopted identical or nearly-identical statutes, with dollar threshold amounts ranging from $2,000 to $50,000, and some with no ability to rebut the nexus presumption.[3] These statutes create physical presence when a retailer uses an independent contractor even if those contractors do not engage in… [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:06 pm
Image of mule from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule#/media/File:Juancito.jpg, By w:User:Dario u / User:Dario urruty (Own work (w:User:Dario u / User:Dario urruty)) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons Image from “O’ Brother Where Art Thou” from http://deepintomovies.blogspot.com/2011/05/o-brother-where-art-thou-2000.html Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender, Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:23 am
Rule 32.1 doesn’t discuss matters that have to be resolved by the sentencing court. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” Steven Mazie takes a quick look at the case at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:33 pm
New York: Harper, 2018.Bender, Steven W. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Connor O’Neill and Abigail Yeo preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
§ 20.3(o)(2) and (3)(xii). [read post]
