Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 19,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 7:13 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Pearlstein v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
” The statute would therefore outlaw the sale in the United States of a bullfighting video produced in Spain (since bullfighting is not legal in the United States), the sale of any hunting video or magazine in the District of Columbia (since no hunting is allowed in the District) or the sale of a crossbow hunting video or magazine in the many states which allow hunting with compound bows but not with crossbows. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:17 pm
The first-sale doctrine as applied to goods manufactured outside of the United States was recently at issue in the Supreme Court in Costco v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:24 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Merck & Cie v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:34 am
Nathan Webb won in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 4:38 pm
See Hazelquist v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Corp. et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:32 am
See Dunlop v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
In Sharpe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:31 pm
Sales Corp., 82 Md. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
" Thought, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
There’s a lot going on in Wendell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:29 am
It often falls to state departments, local legislatures, and other agencies to sort out licensing and sales practices. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
” See Pennock & Sellers v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
Hurley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Both states allowed in-state, but not out-of-state, wineries to make direct sales to consumers. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:54 am
Based on all of these restrictions, the court held the three criteria were satisfied, and the purchaser of the software was a licensee, not an owner, and therefore could not rely on the first sale doctrine as a defense to copyright infringement.More detail of Vernor v. [read post]
