Search for: "Samuel Washington"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2020, 2:00 pm
Samuel Yates of Maud, Texas is accused in the U.S.Eastern District of Texas of seeking millions of dollars in loans from funds intended for people affected by the pandemic. [read post]
18 May 2020, 12:49 pm
We didn’t recall reading much about the appearance or marital status of John Roberts or Samuel Alito when President Bush nominated them just a few years earlier. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:56 pm
In Washington, Bret Chiafalo, Levi Guerra and Esther John served as electors for the state’s Democratic Party during the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Justice Samuel Alito asks whether the House could justify a subpoena for the president’s personal records as a “case study” for more general legislation. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[s]ome justices including conservative Justice Samuel Alito appeared concerned about the potentially broad ramifications of a ruling backing tribal authority. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Kevin Daley reports for The Washington Free Beacon that the court “seemed wary of Trump administration exemptions to the Obamacare birth control mandate in a marathon teleconference session that lasted over 90 minutes. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Washington Free Beacon and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Justice Samuel Alito isn’t one of them. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
We still know far too little about popular constitutionalism in the early republic (what we do know is owed in no small measure to the authors’ own prior, importantwork on the subject) or how popular constitutionalism, across its many dimensions, intersected with the kind of constitutionalism that manifested itself in James Madison’s learned writings, the Washington administration, or the Marshall Court. [read post]
1 May 2020, 9:54 am
And he came unto him, and said unto him, There were two men in one city; the one rich, and the other poor.2 The rich man had exceeding many flocks and herds:3 But the poor man had nothing, save one little ewe lamb, which he had bought and nourished up: and it grew up together with him, and with his children; it did eat of his own meat, and drank of his own cup, and lay in his bosom, and was unto him as a daughter.4 And there came a traveller unto the rich man, and he spared to take of his own flock… [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
Further, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that, in the case at hand, he would continue to follow the Court’s liberal precedents applying the intelligible principle, but only because there was not a majority to overturn those precedents. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:45 am
Samuel Rebo argued President Trump’s donation of his salary to government agencies poses unique constitutional and statutory questions. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
Kevin Daley reports at The Washington Free Beacon that the “decision clears the way for insurers to collect upwards of $12 billion via an Obamacare program designed to help insurers manage risks they took by participating in ACA exchanges[;] Congress has refused to appropriate federal money for the program since 2014, leaving insurers in the lurch. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 12:43 pm
Matthew Waxman and Samuel Weitzman argued that FDR’s Montgomery Ward seizure is a stark reminder of what unleashing wartime government power over industry has actually looked like. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
In part III-C of its opinion (a part not joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito), the majority candidly explains that one reason for its result is that the contrary rule would waste resources (because the entire administrative proceeding would need to be vacated) and operate only “to save bad patent claims” (because patent owners would seek review of institution decisions only when the agency canceled their patents). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:21 pm
And what Congress decided, is that “instead of requiring state officials and local landowners to beg Washington for permission” to carry out a cleanup, the federal government should have to go to court to stop that cleanup. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Moreover, as of fifteen years after George Washington’s inauguration in 1789, ratification, might believe that Article V had achieved some kind of “Goldilocks” point with regard to the ease or rigor of constitutional amendment. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
" Marcia Coyle is a regular contributor to Constitution Daily and the Chief Washington Correspondent for The National Law Journal, covering the Supreme Court for more than 20 years. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:44 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Samuel Spital discusses Comcast v. [read post]
