Search for: "Sands v. Sands"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2014, 6:58 am
Attorney for the District of Utah initiated the case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm
Adams v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:28 am
By Eric Goldman Evans v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Quarmby, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
(CREED-21 v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
The court ultimately held that both patents were unenforceable because the patentees "purposefully neglected their responsibility of candor to the PTO by 'putting their heads in the sand'" with respect to known prior art references and for disclosing prior art references "in the midst of numerous other references and without identifying it as being of particular interest. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:47 pm
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
The Court’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:36 pm
Merritt (right) had nothing to do with the Ninth's Case o' The Week in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday (Thursday) in the case of Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The issue in that case, Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Welch Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:03 am
See Gonzalez-Servin et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Louis Sands. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
“'We need to draw a line in the sand. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 8:09 am
Brisson Stone, LLC v. [read post]