Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 15,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:35 am by The Docket Navigator
"Turning to undue prejudice, the Court finds [plaintiff's] complaints substantially mitigated by [defendant's] agreement to 'no longer make, use, offer to sell, sell, import or distribute any [of the allegedly infringing] products in the United States, until the earlier of: (a) the date on which the [Patent] Examiner issues a Right of Appeal Notice . . . [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:10 pm by John C. Manoog III
Many states, including Massachusetts, have statutes in place under which a business that sells alcoholic beverages to a person who is obviously intoxicated can be held liable for the resulting damages, including both personal injury and wrongful death. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:21 am by John Jascob
Under Newsome, an out-of-state offer or sale originates from the state if “any portion of the selling process” occurred in the state. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:45 am by Ronald Mann
For the Oregon hypothetical, the solicitor general explains that states never have immunity in the courts of the other states, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Nevada v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Shiffrin
In this respect the Court continues its unprecedented foray in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:59 am by Larry Tolchinsky
From the Florida State Senate Session Tracker, here is how this new bill is described: Short Sale Debt Relief. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
The Target pharmacy normally did not sell Norco . . . .The wholesaler (‘supplier’) typically delivered the drug orders to the pharmacy between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. [read post]
Recently, ElderCounsel published a blog regarding case law out of New Jersey regarding how the state Medicaid office imposed a penalty when a home was sold for less than fair market value. [read post]