Search for: "Seth v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am by Adam Chandler
United States, which will be argued this morning. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
BiographyKF8745.B68 S74 2010Justice Brennan : liberal champion / Seth Stern and Stephen Wermiel.Stern, Seth (Seth Ross), 1975-Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010.BiographyE332.2 .B864 2010Madison and Jefferson / Andrew Burstein and Nancy Isenberg.Burstein, Andrew.New York : Random House, c2010BiographyHB3717 1929 .P47 2010The hellhound of Wall Street : how Ferdinand Pecora's investigation of the Great Crash forever changed American finance / Michael… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court issued the landmark decision, Padillo v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:50 am by James Bickford
  Written by Seth Stern and Stephen Wermiel, the book will appear on October 4. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
New Jersey claiming a jury, not a judge should have decided if she should be sentenced to death, and the other a Strickland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Tom Goldstein
  Katyal’s work before the Court was very highly regarded, including his victory in Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm by Sandy
In Fox Television Statements, Inc. v. [read post]