Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
As the work of McRae, Theoharis, and others has shown, facially race-neutral opposition to racial equality and integration did not originate in the modern era but rather long predated Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
In Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:00 am
In today's Appellate Zealots column in the DJ, Audra Ibarra presents New Trials and Untimely Affidavits, about Kabran v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Moreover, he did not believe that the impasse could be overcome through an amendment to the Constitution, for he regarded Article V's supermajority requirements as virtually encoding gridlock into the amendment process. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
I'm going to do another post shortly about how Bolling v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 8:38 am
Rivers v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
“Annalisa is a sharp, talented attorney and we are happy to have her on board. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 9:42 am
NexStep, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Sharp Healthcare, 108 Cal. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:24 pm
Earlier this month the closely watched case of U.S. ex rel Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare System Inc. (675 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 2012) concluded with a jury finding that the compensation paid to physicians under certain part-time employment agreements by Tuomey Healthcare System resulted in violations of both the federal False Claims Act and the federal Stark law. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
Kleindienst v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 am
Statement from the Scottish Legal Aid Board (pdf) Re: Bank charges - Sharp v Bank of Scotland A spokesperson for the Board stated, “We’re surprised and disappointed that Govan Law Centre (GLC) has publicised this case in its press release, in view of the fact that the Board only received their latest letter yesterday, which raised fresh issues and asked us to consider additional information not previously given to us. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:22 am
In Davis-Miller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:29 am
2 Dec 2024, 3:35 pm
" We have a new data point: Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick's new decision in Tornetta v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:07 am
Sharp Electronics Corporation ArrivalStar S.A. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
The briefs are each side’s attempt to carry out their view of what the Supreme Court had in mind in its June 12 decision (Boumediene v. [read post]
