Search for: "Smith v. Burden" Results 541 - 560 of 1,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The ability of newspapers generally and, in particular, the defendant’s publications, to summarise to the Judge’s satisfaction the burden and content of his earlier decision on 11 February 2021 in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch), evidently irked him. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Shartel's article was, in essence, a defense of the Michigan Supreme Court's 1925 decision in Smith v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Lots of folks on the internet have been talking about the recent district judge decision in Perez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals reversed a perjury conviction where the two-witness rule was not satisfied. blank">Gaffney v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals Case No: 08-3183 District of Nebraska - Omaha [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm by Phil Dixon
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
Smith * Trademark Travesty of the Month–SMJ Group v. 417 Lafayette Restaurant * Online Message Board Protected by 47 USC 230–DiMeo v. [read post]