Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 541 - 560 of 5,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
View the article here | View the Judge's Decision HereCongratulations to AFPD Ed Weiss who scored a dismissal of a failure to register prosecution brought under SORNA in the S.D. of W.Va! [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:35 am
This happened in the recent case of Smith v Carpetright plc, heard by Regional Cost Judge Sparrow in Norwich County Court.The Claimant had entered into a CFA with Godfrey Morgan solicitors. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
Judge Smith begins his opinion by saying:  "Defendants-Appellants Sigmund Eriksen and Raymond Eriksen appeal their convictions stemming from their misappropriation of employee 401(k) contributions to pay their company’s operating expenses. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:47 pm by Rick Hasen
  Dissenting Judge Smith, in addition to disagreeing on the mootness question, apparently has a much broader view of the meaning of “harassment” to support an exemption for disclosure of political data. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
Judge Randy Smith writes a good opinion, and I'm not saying that it's necessarily wrong. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The government argued it didn't need a warrant based on cases from the 70s based on third party doctrine - US v Miller (bank records) and Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:39 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Then, in the wake of a lawsuit brought against then-Durham County prosecutor James Hardin, Jr., Simeon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:41 pm
" Notably, a petition for a writ of certiorari presenting that issue is currently before the Court in Quarterman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In Itochu Corporation v Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH [2012] EWCA Civ 996 the Court of Appeal refused to grant permission to appeal an order granted by Mr Justice Andrew Smith that a sole arbitrator be appointed in an arbitration between the applicants, Itochu Corporation (Itochu) and the respondents, Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH (Johann).Before Andrew Smith J, Johann had argued that, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, the default position set out in section… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
  This three-part series assumes that Judge Cannon correctly decided the constitutional question and, instead, assesses the appropriateness of the Judge’s wholesale invalidation of Special Counsel Smith’s actions. [read post]