Search for: "Smith v. State of Ohio"
Results 541 - 560
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 7:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
There’s one footnote, citing four cases from three jurisdictions: Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:13 pm
State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
The State of Ohio sought review of Smith by the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:35 am
(Although Smith was given concurrent sentences, the opinion even includes a discussion of State v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:12 pm
” Smith, 124 Ohio St. 3d 163, 2009 Ohio 6426, 920 N.E.2d 949. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:06 pm
Mitts reversed the Sixth Circuit and rejected an Ohio death row inmate's challenge to "virtually the same" penalty phase jury instructions considered and upheld last term in Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Mitts (Relisted after the 4/15 and 4/22 Conferences) Docket: 10-1000 Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
We’ll discuss their decision in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
Smith, 2009 Ohio 6426, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 920 N.E.2d 949 (2009). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:05 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:21 am
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
On March 31, 2011, the Sixth District Court of Appeals of Ohio issued its decision in Smith v. [read post]
