Search for: "Sonia Stephens"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
” Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan disagreed with the action. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 11:59 am
” The court’s four more liberal justices – Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – indicated that they would have denied the government’s request for a stay. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor chimed in to make a similar point. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 6:53 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Jonathan Bond, representing the government, received some questions from Ginsburg, Gorsuch and Justice Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:59 am
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor also seemed unsympathetic to Roth’s argument. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:39 am
Several of the justices, including Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, questioned Marcel’s lawyer, Michael Kimberly, on this inconsistency. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 8:02 am
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan all seemed to lean in favor of finding standing. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Any review of a calendar year at the Supreme Court necessarily includes two different terms: the term that ends in June and the new one that begins in October and will run into the following year. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan seemed to agree with the city’s mootness argument. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
” Although she agreed with the majority’s interpretation of the FDCPA, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote separately “to emphasize that this fraud-specific equitable principle is not the ‘bad wine of recent vintage’ of which [her] colleagues speak. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
Gorsuch and Alito, along with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer and Chief Justice John Roberts, all pressed Liu on his conclusion that courts of appeals could “never review an application of law to fact” when Section 1252(a)(2)(D) applies. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:53 pm
Kneedler resisted any effort to compare the statute to a contract, telling Breyer that it was “very far from a contract,” but later in the argument both Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed to agree with Breyer. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
But he received significant pushback not just from Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan but also from Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
To this, Justice Stephen Breyer retorted that “there’s always a possibility that a plaintiff under oath will tell the truth. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor both echoed Ginsburg’s observation. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
When a federal criminal defendant has already requested a lower sentence than the judge ultimately imposes, must that defendant again note an objection after the sentence is announced, to preserve anything other than “plain error” appellate review? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:19 am
Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether this was enough to waive copyright for the annotations, however, saying that the annotations were similar to annotated codes that companies like Westlaw produce that are given full copyright protection. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
In particular, Justice Stephen Breyer seemed to take a steadily stronger view of the matter, drawing on his expertise in the copyright area (about which he wrote in his years as a professor). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:33 pm
Even a champion of administrative power and expertise such as Justice Stephen Breyer (the author of the court’s Cuozzo opinion) may balk at expanding an agency’s unreviewable discretion to cover an issue on which, as Click-to-Call emphasizes, the PTAB has no “comparative expertise” vis-à-vis courts. [read post]
