Search for: "Specter v. Specter"
Results 541 - 560
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
Related posts: Killing Industry: The Supreme Court Blows Mayo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:45 am
Yet, the specter of Columbine arises anytime someone talks about violence in school, even if it's a joke. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:04 am
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
The case is entitled Torres et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
Some commentators have raised the specter of Synder v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
Suffice it to say that this case raises the specter of full-blown corporatism overtaking the entire U.S. economic and social system. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
" Very little in the way of case law helps us figure out a uniform test, despite the fact the Trade Secrets Act is a uniform act adopted everywhere now but New York, Massachusetts, and Texas.It is appropriate, therefore, to look elsewhere, including Judge Posner's opinion in Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful."]; Texas v Johnson, 491 US 397, 414[1989] ["If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
Further, there was always the specter that a court would decide that such uses fell within an experimental use exception.[8] Thus, while these laboratories could be sued, such a threat was rare unless the suit also included use of equipment sold for use in experiments, in which case there was an impact on a commercial market. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Some of you may recall that during last Term’s oral arguments in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
The opinion in Farris v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
A colleague recently drew my attention to the proposition that "in the United States, the specter of class-action lawsuits imposes a higher level of precaution on the part of drug makers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:34 am
In Sukumar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:39 am
Waiting until a defendant has established its business raises numerous equitable issues, not the least of which is the potential harm to third-parties and the specter of a double recovery. -- Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, Division OneOpinion Date: 11/29/11Cite: Whelan Security Co. v. [read post]
