Search for: "Spencer v Spencer" Results 541 - 560 of 1,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
The case, Data Direct Technologies Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc [2009] EWHC 97 (Ch), was heard by Mr Justice Floyd who gave judgment on 26 January, and picked up by the Lawtel subscription-only service.Data Direct claimed payment of software maintenance fees which, it alleged, were due from retail giants Marks & Spencer under the terms of a software licence. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
Although wordy and filled with dicta, the decision foreshadows ongoing litigation on the parameters of the act after a decade of relative quiet since the Fair Share Act was passed.In the case of Spencer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
Spencer recently prevailed in the Ninth Circuit defending the City of Stockton in a high-profile employment law dispute (Hittle v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Fourteen years later, a Pennsylvania court recognized that a physician might not be the best expert on nursing standards, but it still allowed physicians' testimony to be admitted because, "all areas of medical expertise within the knowledge of nurses are also within the knowledge of medical doctors" (Taylor v Spencer Hospital, 292 A2d 449, 452 [Pa Super 1972]). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:04 am
Click here for a more detailed summary.PD-0297-08, Johnny Ray Ocon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
I’ve got to run right now, but I thought I’d note this, and point to the 2-to-1 decision, Blackhorse v. [read post]