Search for: "Stall v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
There may be good political reasons for stalling, and reasonable arguments about the right scope and locus of state intervention, but skipping regulation altogether is bizarre. [read post]
Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120130992, 2013 WL 2368729 (May 21, 2013) [4] Complainant v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am by Florian Mueller
HTC resorts to failure-of-proof and failure-to-state-actionable-claim types of arguments, which are irrelevant for now because the leading German reference on patent litigation clearly says that all a plaintiff needs to do here to state an actionable claim is to allege that a specified patent claim is infringed by certain accused products. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 8:05 am by Joe Mullin
The European Court of Human Rights recognized this in a milestone judgment earlier this year, Podchasov v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:02 pm by Rodger Citron
Cohn, a brilliant, corrupt attorney, first made his name as a prosecutor in the infamous Cold War espionage case, United States v. [read post]