Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases" Results 541 - 560 of 1,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 9:30 am by Steven M. Sweat
 California’s Civil Jury Instructions section 418, the so-called “negligence per se” instruction, could be read to the jury as follows: If you decide 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 3:15 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
In this case, Coastal argued that the jury should have been instructed that if it found Ruhof was at fault, and this fault was a substantial factor in causing Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:20 pm by Court C. VanTassell
In pertinent part, amendments to Civil Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 34, and 37 promote early and effective case management, enhance the means of keeping discovery costs proportional to the underlying litigation, increase the specificity requirements of discovery objections, and standardize the penalties for breaching a duty to preserve electronically stored information. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:20 pm by Court C. VanTassell
In pertinent part, amendments to Civil Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 34, and 37 promote early and effective case management, enhance the means of keeping discovery costs proportional to the underlying litigation, increase the specificity requirements of discovery objections, and standardize the penalties for breaching a duty to preserve electronically stored information. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:57 pm by Steven M. Sweat
Justia, “California Civil Jury Instruction 3921,” Accessed Aug. 5, 2015. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
These appeals involve the subsequent petitions filed by Letitia James, as Public Advocate for the City of New York (hereinafter the Public Advocate), the Legal Aid Society, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and [branches of the NAACP], . . . to unseal and release the grand jury minutes to themselves and to the general public, including transcripts of testimony, exhibits, information about certain grand jurors, and legal instructions. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am by Christopher Simon
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am by Christopher Simon
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am by Christopher Simon
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tasks: 1.Manages and oversees criminal, civil and juvenile cases as assigned by the Chief Judge. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  This standard applies to all non-medical professional malpractice actions and is detailed in California Civil Jury Instruction 600 (“[A/An] [insert type of professional] is negligent if [he/she] fails to use the skill and care that a reasonably careful [insert type of professional] would have used in similar circumstances. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
And appellate courts affirm such denials under a very generous abuse of discretion standard. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  We don't even know if the statements in the particular case are a crime or not.We know that a jury cannot be instructed to merely find that a reasonable person would find the statements threatening. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Suffice to say that viewing what juries do in actual cases will give us a much better understanding of jury behavior and provide valuable information for different techniques in presenting evidence, instructing juries and jury management. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Few, if any, courts instruct juries on the pitfalls of eyewitness identification or caution them to be skeptical of eyewitness testimony. 2. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:46 am by Danielle & Andy
Also, the new case would likely be decided by a jury instead of a judge. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Sean Hanover
The Supreme Court of Delaware is silent about the matter -- and that means you have to hunt through case law to create non-standard instructions. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
The Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for rehearing in that case, and in the companion cases, on the same day it handed down its decision in the attorney-client arbitration case. [read post]