Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 10:14 am
§ 230(c): California’s Superior Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
A recent California Court of Appeals decision held that a biological parent may request a hearing before his or her child is put up for adoption by the state. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
Superior Court of San Francisco County). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:20 am
In the meantime, on February 22 the California Court of Appeal decided Circle Star Center Associates v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
RG18888208 in the Superior Court for Alemeda County, Judge Brad Seligman refused to dismiss ADA claims against the developer of a website for the State of California Department of Public Works and Recreation. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
In City of Garden Grove v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores), Supreme Court Case No. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am
AB-5 codifies the Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:40 pm
Superior Court of San Bernardino (Garlow) (2009) ___ Cal. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
This is doctrinally merely a case about jurisdiction; in particular, whether California retains jurisdiction over dependency matters when it initially exercises jurisdiction (without objection by another state) even though the other state (here, Texas) says that it might reassert jurisdiction if the parents subsequently move back to that state. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
Superior Court, 2014 WL 5468967 (California Court ofAppeals 2014).To understand the motion to suppress, it is necessary to understand how the case arose. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Moreover, the California Supreme Court's substantive analysis in Tarasoff seems powerfully applicable to both scenarios. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
Soon after Cyan, Inc. filed its IPO, shareholders sued in a class action in California Superior Court, seeking remedies under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
Soon after Cyan, Inc. filed its IPO, shareholders sued in a class action in California Superior Court, seeking remedies under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:44 am
Peña v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a full-day seminar entitled "Wage & Hour Class Actions After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
