Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 541 - 560 of 3,612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Natalma M. McKnew
AB-5 codifies the Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
Superior Court, 2014 WL 5468967 (California Court ofAppeals 2014).To understand the motion to suppress, it is necessary to understand how the case arose. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am by Lily Becker
Soon after Cyan, Inc. filed its IPO, shareholders sued in a class action in California Superior Court, seeking remedies under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am by Lily Becker
Soon after Cyan, Inc. filed its IPO, shareholders sued in a class action in California Superior Court, seeking remedies under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a full-day seminar entitled "Wage & Hour Class Actions After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Superior Court of California on a critical issue of first impression at the federal appellate level: whether the PSLRA automatic stay of discovery pending a motion to dismiss in Securities Act cases applies to actions filed in state court. [read post]
Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018), the California Supreme Court adopted the so-called “ABC test” for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor, which AB-5 subsequently codified. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:17 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Last week, in one fell swoop, a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge denied a defendant’s motion for summary adjudication and motion to decertify the plaintiffs’ rest break class, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and issued a $90 million award to a class of 15,000 plaintiffs, while following the California Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Brinker v. [read post]