Search for: "State Employees v. Community College"
Results 541 - 560
of 961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance, Fidan Abdurrahimli, Faculty of Law, Lu [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
California and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:02 pm
Ivy Tech Community College, ruled that sexual orientation is not a protected category under Title VII. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:05 am
Must you "friend" (v., transitive) someone you've only met once? [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
The New Daily reports that residents of a remote Northern Territory community have launched defamation action against Channel Seven over a segment on its Sunrise breakfast program. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Communication with employees should be encouraged for testing, isolation and expansion of contact testing.Recently, Dr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
In the Lindke case, Port Huron City Manager James Freed used a Facebook page he first created in college to post mostly personal items, but he also discussed communications from the city. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of City of Dante et al.Amicus brief of Randall Community Water District (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Wagner Community School District No. 11-4 (forthcoming) Title: Hein v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Hunter next discussed the Board’s recent invitation for input on whether university faculty members are employees covered under the NLRA or are managerial employees excluded from coverage, as was established by the case NLRB v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Fordham 27 (Report 3): DMCA - 20 years later | Fordham 27 (Report 2): IP - Past, Present & Future | Fordham 27 (Report 1): Key Current IP Issues: Reflections & Analysis | Event Report: IPAN World IP Day Celebrations | German Federal Court of Justice refers new case on communication to the public | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (Second Part) | Follow the IPKat page on LinkedIn! [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
While his lawsuit was pending, he disclosed that he had been taking college drafting courses for the past two years. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
Martinez's employer, Monroe County Community College, and that the college's refusal to include her spouse under the employee benefits plan violated the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:33 pm
Now, the background legal rule: Generally speaking the government may discipline (including firing) an employee based on the employee's speech if the speech is not said by the employee as part of the employee's job duties, Garcetti v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 8:18 am
Civil Rights and Sexual Orientation On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. [read post]
