Search for: "State Road Department v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
However, the BBC reported that the Department for Digital Culture, Media and Sport (“DCMS”) has stated that it has no comment on the matter at this time. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
  Although a demand for retroactivity of wages and benefits is generally a mandatory subject of negotiations under the Act and arbitrable under §204.9(g) of the Act, the Association asserted that the joint employer’s proposal was prohibited based upon the rationale in the Appellate Division, Third Department’s decision in Baker v Board of Education, Hoosick Falls Central School District, 3 AD3d 678, 37 PERB ¶7502 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:16 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  In fact, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) requires that each driver of a commercial vehicle perform a full pre-trip inspection of his or her vehicle, and this includes walking around the vehicle and checking all tires. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Florian Mueller
as far as the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) is concerned. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by Blake Marcus
History As the United States developed a more intricate highway system in the 1960s and 1970s, the automobile became increasingly more important. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
  In response to the decision, NCDOT Secretary Gene Conti released this statement: “We have received the opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the Monroe Bypass case. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
The legal obstacle is that they would undoubtedly argue that they are bodyguards for State Department offiicals, and so their role is not "supporting the mission of the Department of Defense overseas. [read post]