Search for: "State in Interest of TB"
Results 541 - 560
of 826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
Once the cell phone is in police custody, the state has satisfied its immediate interest in collecting and preserving evidence and can take preventive steps to ensure that the data found on the phone is neither lost nor erased. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:16 am
However, even the limited security right Koch had against forcible extraction of his DNA outweighs the government's interest in obtaining his DNA, since the state legislature had not expressed such an interest at the time his DNA was collected. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:26 am
United States, 429 U.S. 338 (1977))). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
The Virginia Court of Appeals today upheld GPS tracking of a suspected serial rapist's car against a Fourth Amendment and a state constitutional challenge. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
The questions before the court are whether the random drug testing policy adopted by the Board as a state actor violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article III, § 6 of the West Virginia Constitution, and the right to privacy as it is recognized in this state. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
He discussed the interesting aspects of the US decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:15 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Federal Register Highlights The following is an alert of Environmental Federal Register announcements that may be of interest. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:30 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
If, for example, a plaintiff claiming a violation of the state constitutional right to privacy was able to choose freely among competing public or private entities in obtaining access to some opportunity, commodity, or service, his or her privacy interest may weigh less in the balance. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:02 pm
Thus, the checkpoint to enforce the sticker ordinance comports with none of the purposes which the United States Supreme Court has found to be important enough to override the individual liberty interests secured by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:25 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
[¶] While we are mindful of the significant danger faced by police officers during traffic stops, we must balance the interests of officer safety with the privacy interests protected by the Fourth Amendment in requiring law enforcement to use the least intrusive means necessary to investigate a traffic stop. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
