Search for: "State of Me. v. Thomas"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2020, 10:20 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:40 am
This is what Paxton, along with the various state officials who have joined Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
“How the fuck do you think it worked out for me? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
[The fur defendant states in Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
As recently as this past February, two justices (Thomas and Alito) expressed the view that the Court is obligated to grant such motions and hear state claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
Monday’s argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:44 pm
United States and McDonald v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
How do you think Hamilton would have viewed the state of modern Supreme Court nominations? [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In a more recent case, Lujan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Professor Velte’s post draws on arguments in an amicus brief that she authored, submitted in Fulton on behalf of respondents and joined by several legal scholars (including me). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” It also stated that the “venerable mansion which he erected 120 years ago is still standing in a state of good preservation. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
Franklin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Like I said, this one is an easy victory for me. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am
To me, it was striking that there was little discussion of the "special solicitude" on standing issues that the Supreme Court held applies to state governments in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
Fordice (1992) (Thomas, J., concurring)). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am
The panel majority also rejected Mckesson's argument that NAACP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
United States, 20-5758Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should revisit and recede from its decision in Deal v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
Until this week, only Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for himself, had ever invoked any aspect of Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Gore litigation—Chief Justice William Rehnquist joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas—that is the modern font of this notion that elected state legislatures are protected from interference by other state bodies with regard to regulation of federal elections. [read post]
