Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
The Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
The Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
But Wednesday's decision in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
The court also granted the state human rights agency’s motion to intervene (Wilson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:05 am
But in June of 2002, in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
The federal district court in Minnesota properly denied Bombardier’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, the Federal Circuit ruled, rejecting Bombardier’s contention that the strength of its evidence was sufficient to nullify the jury’s verdict (Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
Our first post on the subject, available here, protested an adventurous (and Erie-improper) decision by a New Mexico federal district court that ignored no fewer than five decisions by the New Mexico Court of Appeals (Serna v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
Starks v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
The Trump campaign challenged the secretary of state’s new guidance in federal court. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New York granting summary judgment for defendants (i.e., Ciprofloxacin HCl manufacturers). [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 8:05 pm
In Limon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Wyoming No tax No tax No tax District of Columbia Rolling State calculation Federal gross receipts and sales State Taxation of GILTI GILTI or not GILTI—in many states, the verdict is in doubt. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am
LEXIS 104665 (D MN, July 27, 2012), a Minnesota federal district court, adopting a magistrate's recommendations as to this part of the case (2012 U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:16 am
Due Process: The court says plaintiff adequately states a due process claim because he was not given a hearing before he was disciplined. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
I understand that some say Section 1 should apply even to unilaterally-imposed contracts, but come down on the same side as the district court (and believe Apple should be held in violation of Section 2).The states' focus on Section 1 is motivated by their Google case, which involves business terms Google imposes on Android device makers on the one hand and on developers on the other.Epic wouldn't automatically win the case if Section 1… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:24 pm
The Northern District of California took up the issue in Digital Envoy, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In trying to interpret statutes enacted in the pre-internet age, district courts are essentially improvising in many respects. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:36 pm
And now there's another, State v. [read post]
