Search for: "State of S. D., Appeal of" Results 541 - 560 of 27,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Since the FTB has determined that it will not appeal the appellate court's ruling on the unconstitutionality of the fee, the ruling stands and becomes state law. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In stating its interest in filing the amicus brief in support of HotChalk’s appeal, UP stated that in its view the D&O insurer’s “interpretation of the subject exclusion renders paid-for coverage illusory. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
The court of appeals stated that UIM coverage is not intended to permit an injured employee to collect more than she would have been entitled to receive from the tortfeasor alone. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Michael and Burkhard guest post follows: Introduction D&O Insurance Policies are widespread in Germany nowadays after initial adoption from its homeland in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:36 am by Steve Hall
Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, praised the Texas Attorney General's move on Friday. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
Defendant appealed that judgment, but the Court of Appeals found no error in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:00 am by Jack Bogdanski
Then I'd move there.It's infuriating that the politicians are playing along with this so eagerly. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:32 am by Patricia Salkin
Furthermore, it was undisputed that the plain language of the ordinance did not require that neighboring property owners be given notice of a city official’s decision that a homeowner’s stated proposed use for his/her property was permitted under the existing zoning classification as a matter of right. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:59 am by John Floyd
  Tenth Circuit Rules §3583(k) Unconstitutional   Last month the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am by Florian Mueller
According to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeals court's "mandate must issue 7 days after the time to file a petition for rehearing expires". [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
The IRS refused, and ultimately the Coxes appealed to the United States Tax Court. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:34 pm by David M. Fry
In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 09-MD-2118-SLR (D. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am by Phil Dixon
The district court denied the motion and the defendant pled guilty, reserving his right to appeal. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 10:58 am by Daniel Cappetta
” In its decision, the Appeals Court “conclude[d] that the judge erred in these circumstances in ordering the cell phones wiped before their return. [read post]