Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 541 - 560
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
At VERDICT, Vikram Amar analyzes the issues in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:24 am
REV. 181 (2009); see also Ellen Katz, From Bush v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Briefly: At Verdict, Vikram David Amar examines the issues in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Gibbons Addison, Note, A proposed wealth distribution system based on the underlying premise of revenue sharing in American pro sports, 89 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1179 (2011) Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as regulator, litigant, and state actor, 52 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 415 (2011) Andrew D. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
Lopez, United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Even the leading academic supporters of Obamacare’s constitutionality, such as Yale law professors Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin, use the term, as did Time magazine’s managing editor Richard Stengel in his recent cover story about the Constitution. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
originalists, or originalists who became touchstones for conservatives), we begin to see the development of the originalist v. originalist dynamic for the first time in post-war constitutional discourse, a sure sign of intellectual influence realized (see, e.g., today, liberal originalists like Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
” (citing Elrod v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:26 pm
See Amaral v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
The other (Amar) believes that while it raises substantial questions, it has not been empirically proved. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
State of Bihar v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:28 am
This article begins with the intellectual primogenitor of this approach: Barron v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:34 am
This article begins with the intellectual primogenitor of this approach: Barron v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:58 am
But if each State is equally divested of power, arguably Article V is not violated because each State still has "equal Suffrage in the Senate," i.e., no suffrage at all. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:22 am
Justice GangulyThe Supreme Court in Amar Singh v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:52 am
Congress acts, in short, against the background of the total corpus juris of the states in much the way that a state legislature acts against the background of the common law, assumed to govern unless changed by legislation.One might think that patent law is entirely federal, but Professor Amar (who has also reviewed an earlier edition of the casebook) liked to remind us that federal law is never in a vacuum.Amar often cited a 1957 article by the late Paul Mishkin, The… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:00 pm
Buzuvis HURRICANE WARNING FLAG FOR OLYMPIC SPORTS: COMPLIANCE PRACTICES IN BIEDIGER V. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
Yen, Foreword [PDF] Symposium Articles Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as Regulator, Litigant, and State Actor, 52 B.C. [read post]
