Search for: "State v. Atkins" Results 541 - 560 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009), mandating a cut-off IQ score of 70 or below to meet the first prong of the test for mental retardation in capital sentencing, is contrary to Atkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm by MacIsaac
  It is not necessary to recapitulate the facts which have been fully stated by my noble and learned friend, Lord Atkin. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:13 am by SHG
  The reasoning makes the manner in which Georgia ignores the Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:26 am by Steve Hall
” On Tuesday the state of Texas decided for the tenth time to exercise the discretion allowed by the Atkins v Virginia ruling to examine claims of mental impairment to determine for itself a death row inmate’s degree of capacity, and it executed Marvin Wilson. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:47 pm by Amy Howe
In 2002, three years after Bowles was sentenced, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am by Steve Hall
  The mentally retarded were also shielded from execution by the 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Atkin, Michigan State University: The Role of Involvement, Scientific Literacy, Education, and Message Format in Influencing the Lay Public’s Regulatory Attitude about PFOA Exposure. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Atkins reported on Twitter over the weekend that an “irked party” had been in contact about the new film. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Texas 15-65Issue: Whether Texas’s standard for determining if a capital defendant meets the second prong of the definition of intellectual disability (“deficits in adaptive functioning”) violates the Eighth Amendment in light of Atkins v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]