Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 541 - 560
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
The frustration from coalition MPs stems from the fact that Labour “got away with” avoiding legislation on a controversial issue and, through their procrastination, pushed the Strasbourg Court to the point where it further restricted the UK’s range of responses on prisoner enfranchisement. [6] Offenders serving sentences for serious or violent offences must not be enfranchised Nonetheless, it remains true that the exact scope of what would constitute an acceptable level of… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
The SBAs issued an ordinance (Delegation of Functions to the Republic Ordinance) stating that the Republic of Cyprus are responsible for taking care of trade mark registrations for the SBAs. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The saga of Case C 208/09 Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, in which the court gave its ruling on 22 December, all began in Vienna, Austria, in 1944 where Ilonka was born, instantly becoming an Austrian citizen. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:03 pm
The introductory section takes issue with max Weber’s national state. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:27 am
28/04 Tod’s and Tod’s France [2005] ECR I-5781, paragraph 19; and Case C-147/03 Commission v Austria [2005] ECR I-5969, paragraph 41). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
He asked the administrative court initially, following Hirst No. 2 and the more recent case of Frodl v Austria (see our post), if there was anything else it could do to implement the principles made very clear in those judgments. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm
V. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Austria, (U of St. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
Austria. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Celní úrad Tabor) - the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
It doesn't get much stronger than an actual condition for admission to the Council of Europe.- Also, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria (para 61), the Court abandoned previous case-law to the effect that a marriage within the meaning of Article 12 could only ever exist between a man and a woman. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Bakalar v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
Their data was stored on webservers in Germany and Austria but could be accessed via links from elsewhere, including the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Nahum (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Nevada: Online forum operator gets easy 47 USC 230 Win: Two Plus Two v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Undeterred and emboldened by the power of repetition (and the "cut and paste" function in word) the ECHR then proceeded to say the same things (sometimes with reasonableness thrown in for good measure and/or confusion) in Cosic v Croatia, Zehentner v Austria and Paulic v Croatia. [read post]
