Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 541 - 560 of 2,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
Alabama: The Lynd Case The third case, Lynd v Marshall County Pediatrics, P.C., No. 1160683 [Ala. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
  Be warned – there are a lot of hot dog incidents: Baseball Mascots and the Law, 65 Kansas Law Review 105 (2016) Coomer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm by Beth Farmer
However, the majority stated, “commercial realities” may require inclusion of different products or services in a single market, citing United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:26 pm by Randazza
So the WHOLE FUCKING THING is one big ball of political propaganda. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:46 am by Robert Laplaca
  The State argued that these items are subject to a sales tax because they are tangible personal items purchased by the ball club – the same way you’re hit with sales tax when you buy that ball cap from the stadium store. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:49 am by Mark Summerfield
  I will also show you where a Patent Office hearing officer, in upholding the rejection of a patent application by an examiner, expressly stated that it is legitimate to consider the prior art when assessing patent-eligibility of computer-related subject matter. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Students for Life at Ball State University v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 5:56 am by John Wright
  Ball Field And Sports Betting Previously, PASPA had forbidden sports gambling in all but four states. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between an individual's "domicile" and his or her "residence"Campaniello v New York State Div. of Tax Appeals Trib., 2018 NY Slip Op 03400, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFrom time to time an applicant for public employment or an employee is required to be "domiciled"* with the physical jurisdiction of the employer. [read post]