Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 541 - 560
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
" State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
CMS states that contractors may set thresholds for the number of services allowed before medical review, but may not limit the number of services provided. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Although the motion judge refused to strike the claim, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and stated that the proper defendant in the case was the manufacturer. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc. (4th Cir. 2018): This litigation represented multiple consolidated putative class-action lawsuits following separate incidents in 2013 and 2014 involving the theft or loss of items containing the personal information of patients of the Dorn Veterans Affairs Medical Center. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
He examined Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
The state did not provide any expert witnesses (or witnesses of any kind) to refute the court-appointed, board-certified expert's diagnosis of mild mental retardation. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
" Medical monitoring, however, involves "the quantifiable costs of periodic medical examinations. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
The statute requires that every employer, before hiring any person, verify that the person is not an unauthorized alien by examining specified documents that establish the person's identity and eligibility for employment in the United States and completing Form I-9, which evidences that examination. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
The statute requires that every employer, before hiring any person, verify that the person is not an unauthorized alien by examining specified documents that establish the person's identity and eligibility for employment in the United States and completing Form I-9, which evidences that examination. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
All the way from the European Patent Office's Boards of Appeal's Bill Chandler comes a reminder that those who wish to practise before that august office must first qualify by passing their professional examinations. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:36 am
As the pre-game setting up of the pieces concluded, last minute procedural steps were being taken in the case of The United States v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 12:04 am
Florida Death Penalty and Politics Florida Death Penalty Inquiry Welcomed Florida death row UCI and Florida State Prison v execution chamber Florida death work Florida death-penalty system: In legal limbo? [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
NYPD appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Short v Board of Mgrs. of Nassau County Med. [read post]
