Search for: "State v. Body" Results 541 - 560 of 14,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
” For completeness, he concluded in stating [emphasis added]: “[20]. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
” Far from creating a body of law that people can rely on, he continued, Chevron fosters “massive change … not stability. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
This is because each of five permanent members of the Council — China, France, Russia, the U.K., and the United States – enjoy veto power over any actions the body might consider. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” The incident report states that the passenger became verbally aggressive towards Pace and demanded her to drive faster when she began recording the incident on her cellphone. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” The incident report states that the passenger became verbally aggressive towards Pace and demanded her to drive faster when she began recording the incident on her cellphone. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am by Rose Hughes
 Amending the description and claim-like clausesThe EPO Guidelines for Examination currently require that, when adapting the description, an applicant must either delete subject matter not covered by the claims or explicitly state in the description that such subject matter is not part of the invention (F-IV, 4.3). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]