Search for: "State v. CC"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
The s.202 reviews were carried out by more senior officers of Birmingham CC as per the standard review process. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
The s.202 reviews were carried out by more senior officers of Birmingham CC as per the standard review process. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Photo credit: milos milosevic via Foter.com / CC BY [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:39 am
By Coolcaesar, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link In Amanda Frlekin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The Court of Appeal considered DTs in R (Gilboy) v Liverpool CC [2009] QB 699 (our note here) and held that they were indistinguishable from ITs. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The Court of Appeal considered DTs in R (Gilboy) v Liverpool CC [2009] QB 699 (our note here) and held that they were indistinguishable from ITs. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
Here, the CC&Rs state that the use by the plaintiff “shall be exclusive. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
Main Request, Rule 111(2) EPC2.1 At the time when the contested decision was issued, the requirements for issuing a refusal using a standard form referring to previous communications were set out in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, November 2016, C-V, 15.2.According to the first paragraph of Guideline C-V, 15.2, in order to comply with the requirement that a decision be reasoned (Rule 111(2)), it is only possible to use this form of decision where the previous… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
In Joy Zinante v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:01 pm
(See, for example, Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:02 am
The court’s eventual decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:03 am
Photo: Beatrice Murch via Flickr (CC by 2.0)In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court has held that employers may enforce arbitration agreements signed by employees that bar class-action lawsuits and require individualized arbitration. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
(Private figure plaintiffs must still demonstrate fault on the part of the defendant in order to win a defamation case, but the specific level of fault that a private figure plaintiff must show varies from state to state.) [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
(Private figure plaintiffs must still demonstrate fault on the part of the defendant in order to win a defamation case, but the specific level of fault that a private figure plaintiff must show varies from state to state.) [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
Photo credit: Infomastern on Foter.com / CC BY-SA [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:41 am
The case is Sugartown Worldwide LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
