Search for: "State v. Community Distributors"
Results 541 - 560
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
It's too easy to say we disbelieve an artist's purpose, as in Koons v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:27 pm
Per AST Sports Science, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:51 am
Defendants’ attorneys submitted a response stating they had not received any communication from Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:16 am
However, that principle of law is not applicable incases where the exclusive distributor had pre-existing rights in the mark (Lutz Superdyne, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Compevo AB v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:09 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITAntitrust
Distributor's Claims Did Not Show Supplier's Vertical Expansion, Refusal to Deal to Be Anticompetitive
Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:25 am
GP Industries v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:53 am
., et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:48 pm
Posted by Ronnie London and Sarah DuranThe United States District Court for the Western District of Washington(state) has issued a decision in Zango, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 3:53 am
According to Wikipedia, BitTorrent is a "peer-to-peer file sharing (P2P) communications protocol" and is a "method of distributing large amounts of data widely without the original distributor incurring the entire costs of hardware, hosting and bandwidth resources. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:30 pm
American Airlines v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
Hendleson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 2:24 am
The Second Circuit tackled this question in Phillips v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
On July 23, 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that that it will deliver its decision on Euro-Excellence, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
