Search for: "State v. Concepcion"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempts state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
As the Concepcion court reiterated, “States cannot require a procedure that is inconsistent with the FAA, even if it is desirable for unrelated reasons. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:44 am
The decision purports to not expressly interpret Concepcion, stating, “[t]he conclusions we reach here avert any dependence . . . on two recent United States Supreme Court opinions, addressing the issue of class arbitrations for antitrust claims and consumer sales contracts. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
The opinion’s reasoning may well be followed by other California state courts analyzing whether Cruz survived Concepcion -- notwithstanding the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Kilgore. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:07 pm
In making its decision, the California Court of Appeal in this case found that the Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion, which concerned the validity of the California Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Discover Bank v Superior Court, prohibits any state court from refusing to enforce a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The Eighth Circuit upheld this tactic in Rolwing v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Concepcion) as a virtual death knell for class actions. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
In Iskanian v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Concepcion, are unfair to consumers. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
Concepcion , 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011) addresses state contract rights and does not apply to Amex III since Amex III deals with federal statutory rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Supreme Court's decision in AT&T v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Then along came AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:57 am
See Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
Concepcion. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Instead, it found that under Concepcion, the FAA preempts any attempt by a court or state legislature to insulate a particular type of claim from arbitration. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
