Search for: "State v. Cooper"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:39 am
The contention that the free standing Fourth Amendment claim was decided wrongly by state courts is barred under Stone v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Hoffer v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:42 am
A North Carolina Filmmaker Continues to Challenge State Sovereign Immunity — Litigation in Allen v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:23 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm
This Ibero-American Convention conceives videoconferencing as a resource that enhances and expedites cooperation between the competent authorities of the signatory States. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 10:07 pm
In Brooks v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
The crux of a Title VII inquiry is “the reason for a particular employment decision,” Cooper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Blake Cooper, a Reno County public defender, won in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In this case decided by the New York State Court of Appeals, the judges find that the police were allowed to conduct a limited protective search this guy's car because they reasonably thought the car had weapons.The case is People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
