Search for: "State v. Crims"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
It has also asked for an adjournment in an Operation Elveden trial involving a journalist while it considers the “wider implications” of the decision in R v ABC and others [2015] EWCA Crim 359. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
McGowan, 2002 NY SlipOp 40330(U), at 3 [Crim Ct., Richmond County 2002]; People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
Page 3 1 (Crim Ct, Kings County, Cyrulnik, J.), quoting People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm
An alternate school of thought, however, is the less technical rationale presented in People v Modica, 187 Misc 2d 635 (Crim Ct Richmond County 2001), where the court held that "[i]f the elements of the crime or crimes charged are established by the facts contained in the DIR and the DIR, upon inspection by the court, is reasonably referable to the incident alleged in the accusatory instrument, the court may rely on the non-hearsay facts contained in the DIR on determining… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:20 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
"], lv to appeal denied, 13 NY3d 748 [2009]; People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232, 234 (Crim Ct, Kings County 2008] ["Because New York does not have a complete ban on the possession of handguns in the home... [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
(Crim.) [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
"The dominant interest of the State in preventing violence and property damage cannot be questioned" (Auto Workers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Crim. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
The Panopticon blog outlines the legal issues and consequences for Data Protection in the UK here Third, there an important decision of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division in the case of R v ABC and others [2015] EWCA Crim 359. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
Crim. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Crim. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Crim. [read post]
