Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 541 - 560 of 9,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:26 am by SHG
In a complaint eerily reminiscent of Rakofsky v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Jury Verdict for Doctor, Plaintiff Fails to Prove Misdiagnosed Heart Infection - Monahan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
While recognizing that "there is little doubt that Rogers meant his statement to Friedlander about smoking marijuana to be confidential," the state's high court debated the definition of doctor in the law and whether a paramedic qualifies. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Gee) by two doctors and an abortion clinic to prevent a Louisiana abortion law from going into effect as they pursue their case at the Supreme Court; the state’s response is due tomorrow. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:29 am by Joe Consumer
As has been noted, doctors who bill Medicare or Medicaid for tests and procedures done for personal purposes as opposed to what are medically necessary for patients, are committing fraud under federal and state Medicare/Medicaid programs. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:29 am by Joe Consumer
As has been noted, doctors who bill Medicare or Medicaid for tests and procedures done for personal purposes as opposed to what are medically necessary for patients, are committing fraud under federal and state Medicare/Medicaid programs. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:25 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Ctr., February 2, 2017, In the Supreme Court of Washington State More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Plaintiff Suffers Worsening Symptoms After Having a Surgery Performed by the Defendant The plaintiff in the case of Borrayo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jim Singer
 In Mayo v, Prometheus (No. 10-1150, March 20, 2012), the Court held that U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]