Search for: "State v. Dunn"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 7:56 am
Jerold Dunn, No. 106,586 (Labette)Direct appeal (petition for review); Forgery/stalkingRick KittelDefective complaint (forgery)Insufficient evidence (stalking)State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
State Bank v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:38 am
The use of Drones by Law Enforcement: Joseph Hartshorne, Commander, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – Homeland Security Division Christopher Dunn, Captain, Ventura County Sheriff’s Office Jessica Farris, Policy and Advocacy Counsel, ACLU of Southern California V. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:00 am
Aldrich v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In Bell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
