Search for: "State v. Foley" Results 541 - 560 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 5:23 pm by SOIssues
Circuit Court of Appeals would even need to hear oral arguments in the case of Miller, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
G14, 613 words, POLICE BEAT, Compiled by Mary Beth Foley... [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Reasonable possibility it affected the verdict - State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP)   Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46)   South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP)   Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
The company was reluctant to make engineers available for deposition because, Foley's brief states, they "were focused on product development rather than the Red Hat case and as a result were not sufficiently responsive. [read post]