Search for: "State v. Glen"
Results 541 - 560
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 3:24 pm
Courts have court defined the term in the cases of Shapiro v Glens Falls Ins. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer: Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC; Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders: Clark QC, J Brown; Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 913; Weinberg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:41 am
Jennifer Marie Renken and John Glen Renken have four children together. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Indeed, when a Supreme Court plurality in Barnes v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
WETLANDS United States v. [read post]
