Search for: "State v. Henderson"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
Assuming that Henderson had never transferred the copyright in the 1969 mural, those rights would not have expired, and his VARA rights would still be enforceable for a previously-created work. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd & Anor, heard 14-15 May 2014. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd & Anor, heard 14-15 May 2014. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
• Jay Westermeier of Finnegan Henderson analyzes the data breach consent decrees entered into by the FTC to indicate how the agency is likely to exercise its authority under FTC v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd & Anor, heard 14-15 May 2014. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:41 am
Justice Carolyn Berger’s 14-page opinion in ATP Tour Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:00 am
Owens v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd & Anor, heard 14-15 May 2014. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:24 am
How the Prescription Act applies to property mattersThe Prescription Act 68 of 1969 states that a claim to a debt must be finalised within a specified time limit. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
“Judges accept, with little or any discussion, the submissions or evidence that identifying class members is ‘cost-prohibitive,’” it states. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The Amici brief (authored by myself and Matt Henderson) can be accessed at the League of California Cities’ website here http://www.cacities.org/Resources-Documents/Member-Engagement/Professional-Departments/City-Attorneys/Request-Amicus-Support/Recent-Filings/Briefs-(1)/California-Building-Indusry-Assn-v-Bay-Area-Air-Qu Questions? [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
Circuit in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Miller, Wade Henderson, Don T. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
But, as held by Judge Birss QC (as he then was) in Henderson v All Around the World Recordings Ltd [2013] EWPCC 19, the exercise of that discretion is conditional on the special rules as to the costs in the then Patents County Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
