Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Even former United States Attorney General Eric Holder recently expressed his belief that marijuana “ought to be rescheduled. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Han v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Some important take-away points from the majority opinion Satisfying a compelling state interest: When it comes to denying a First Amendment expression claim owing to a finding of a compelling state interest, that, too, is quite rare — Holder v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
Holder, No. 01-cv-01854 (D. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:15 am
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV, formerly Sony Logistics Europe BV (Case C-153/10); [2011] WLR (D) 130 “A person who made customs declarations in his own name and on his own behalf could not rely on a binding tariff information of which he was not the holder, but which associated company on whose instructions he made those declarations. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Here is an interesting case from Missouri: In Rodgers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
Chief Justice Morrison Waite In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:28 am
AC34983 - State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
AMP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:05 pm
Holder, will be argued tomorrow in the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:42 am
Here are the materials in Inetianbor v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
As stated in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Erie Sand & Gravel Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:00 am
Though there was a possibility of such a relationship developing, the Court saw this as extremely unlikely, and recognised that whilst children are rights-holders on their own account, their rights are not a passport to another person’s rights. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
We previously reported on developments in various United States Courts of Appeal decisions concerning reverse payments in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlements - that is, payments made by branded pharmaceutical patent holders to generic challengers to postpone market entry of the generic product. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Holder, 10-577, which it relisted last week. [read post]
