Search for: "State v. Irvin" Results 541 - 560 of 608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
Laddie J in Irvine v Talksport [2002] EWHC 367 explained at [9] the difference between endorsement and merchandising:'When someone endorses a product or service he tells the relevant public that he approves of the product or service or is happy to be associated with it. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [1] TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
Both of these points were explained with characteristic lucidity and verve by Laddie J in the context of passing off by false endorsement in Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] EWHC 367 (Ch), [2002] 1 WLR 2355, in particular in the passages quoted below. ... [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Eileen Kane (Penn State) offers a clue in the distinction as between genetics and chemistry. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [1] TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Chemerinsky also serves as the dean of the University of California, Irvine, School of Law, which he was involved in founding. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Camacho, University of California-Irvine School of Law and Robert L. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]