Search for: "State v. Jean" Results 541 - 560 of 1,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
From SSRN:Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by Venkat
In a previous case, Bank (or someone who shares his name, including his middle initial) tried to assert a section 1983 claim in federal court based on a state court judge's denial of his request to wear jeans and a hat in court: "Lawyer Has No First Amendment Right to Wear Hat in Court, Federal Judge Decides. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim must be pleaded with particularity and allege “intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit” (Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [2018]). [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am by John L. Welch
LFC Corporate Services, Inc., Opposition No. 91181109 [Section 2(d) opposition to LFC, LFC.COM, and LFC ONLINE for various real estate services, in view of several LF marks for real estate services].May 25, 2010 - 2 PM: In re DG Fastchannel, Inc. , Serial No. 77136602 [Section 2(d) refusal of HD NOW for "Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of video advertising media and metadata via proprietary media management systems" [HD disclaimed], in view of the stylized mark HD NOW shown… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Groupe Jean Coutu (PJC) inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am by Rick St. Hilaire
But the government's lawyers contend that the claimant's reading of the law is wrong, citing in part the federal district court case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:15 am by David DePaolo
Last month I pointed out a Missouri Supreme Court case that I thought highlighted why states have been imposing artificial limitations to temporary total disability status; there are some who never seem to get better in order to enjoy the higher indemnity payment of TTD.But the problem is that artificial TTD limits ensnare folks who face a change in medical condition and legitimately are TTD, but the law doesn't recognize that exception creating a huge financial hardship on the injured… [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]