Search for: "State v. Kay"
Results 541 - 560
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
Next Thursday, November 5, the seven justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will sit at the bench behind me to hear the criminal case of State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
the decisions in Qazi, Kay and Doherty. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
The question in Kay v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
Mary Kay v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The two cases before the court were Godfrey v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
By Glen Hansen In Lin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
" Maybe Administrator Babbitt got it right when he concluded his remarks by stating that "if you think the safety bar is set too high, your sights are set way too low. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles.Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
Unlike Connors or Kay, Ms Stokes had not lawfully lived on the pitch for a number of years. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office) United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Frangopoulos kai Sia OE v Nomarkhiaki Avtodiikisi Korinthias (Class 46) L’Oréal wins decision against Bellure to prevent comparative advertising: L’Oréal v Bellure (The IP Factor) Who speaks for the European majority? [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Kay Beer Distrib., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:47 am
" "Yipeee kai aaaa mother f'er. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:05 am
” O’Lone v. [read post]
