Search for: "State v. Lane" Results 541 - 560 of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
"Frederick Lane at the NewsFactor Network summarizes the case as follows (May 17, 2007):"Last year, a U.S. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
” Preservation of Wainscott, Inc. v New York State Public Service Commission, 2023 NY Slip Op 02510 (2d Dept. 5/10/23). [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:51 pm
The case holds that state courts are free, on state habeas, to give retroactive effect to U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
™  In State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
The taxi began spinning out of control while driving around a curve in the left-hand lane near the Hapeville overpass, crossed three lanes of traffic, and crashed into a large tree 20 or more feet away from the edge of the acceleration lane, killing Mrs. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Sarah Seo argues that Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state, the town, and the liquor dealers then appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to rule both that ambiguity about the Solem v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
(“Huntersville Property”) for sale and to split the net sale proceeds; list a marital Condominium property located at 18829 Vineyard Point Lane, Cornelius, N.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 2:42 am
To my surprise, the facts in the Kentucky case, Lane v Lane, were far more similar to Reed v Reed, the Michigan court of appeals case upholding a prenup against a claim of unconscionability, which the Trudeau-Chene court distinguished. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:13 pm
No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]