Search for: "State v. Limb" Results 541 - 560 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
(Under the Constitution, States have "sovereign immunity", just like the federal government.) [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:16 am by David Lat
Earlier: Potential Lawsuit / Bar Exam Review Question of the Day: Laurence Tribe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
On its own, this comment would seemingly mean that any death, no matter how remote in time, would potentially engage the procedural limbs of article 2; to borrow Lord Hoffman’s example from Re McKerr [67], the deaths of the Princes in the Tower could require a state-instigated, effective and independent investigation. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 am by Berin Szoka
Remember the infamous $2.86 million judgment awarded to woman who made the very stupid decision to put a copy of freshly brewed coffee between her legs in a car seat in the 1994 case of Liebeck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Jeff Gamso
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm by Gideon
The fifth amendment to the United States constitution declares that no person  shall be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . . . . [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
This is not one of those cases in which it is possible to point simply to a conspicuous inability of the deceased to satisfy one of the distinct limbs of the Banks v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:30 am by B.W. Barnett
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution provides that no person shall be subjected to twice having life or limb in jeopardy for the same offense. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]