Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 541 - 560
of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
The Court states that in this dual system of trade marks, the registration of national trade marks is solely a matter for the Member States and that, therefore, OHIM and the General Court are not competent for either the registration or the declaration of invalidity of those trade marks. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:33 am
As stated stated in this post, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:42 pm
Price v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
United States – with which all other justices in Freeman expressly disagreed – on the theory that it is the “narrowest grounds” of a plurality opinion under Marks v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Trade Mark DilutionUS federal and New York state law allow Tiffany, as an owner of a famous mark, to stop a person from using the Tiffany mark in commerce in a way that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment of the mark. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
"Court takes up case on eyewitness identification," is Mark Sherman's initial AP report on oral arguments in the case of Perry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
The high court’s decision in Barron v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
"A call for separation of school and state": Today in The Boston Globe, columnist Jeff Jacoby has an op-ed that begins, "Whatever else might be said about it, US District Judge Mark Wolf's decision in Parker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
See eBay Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:43 pm
To discuss the case, we have Mark H. [read post]
