Search for: "State v. McDonnell"
Results 541 - 560
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Southwest Airlines, No. 08-873Propriety of the continued application of burden shifting under McDonnell-Douglass and its progeny for FMLA and ADA cases in general, and FMLA entitlement/interference cases and ADA reasonable accommodation cases in particular (Public Citizen)o o SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
Employer could not rely on incomplete info to assert honest belief employee was uncooperative in IME
3 Dec 2013, 8:21 am
The employee’s religious discrimination and harassment claims failed, however (Bloomfield v Whirlpool Corp, November 27, 2013, Helmick, J). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:10 am
Citing the cat’s paw doctrine, the court pointed out that in Poland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
A federal district court’s recent ruling in Thomas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am
And this is common throughout the United States, according to the FEMA Mitigation Branch Director Bill McDonnell. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:03 pm
Supreme Court in its McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
McDonnell, Matthew, Kirsten Engel and Ardeth Barnhart. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
McDonnell et al., 1:18-cv-00361 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
In Crawford v Metro. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:41 am
The Guidelines for Examination, Part F, V, 9, state that “no objection on account of lack of unity a priori is justified in respect of a dependent claim and the claim on which it depends, on the ground that the general concept they have in common is the subject-matter of the independent claim, which is also contained in the dependent claim”. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am
Indeed, neither recommending officer stated in his affidavit that he did not have a chance to consider the employee. [read post]
