Search for: "State v. Mounts" Results 541 - 560 of 2,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
The petitions of the day are: Mount Soledad Memorial Association v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by SHG
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Oliveira, and age-discrimination case Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:01 pm
The recent New York Supreme Court decision in Ottinger v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment  status of a public employee while he or she is serving a… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment  status of a public employee while he or she is serving a… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm by Karen Gullo
—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today urged the Supreme Court today to review and reverse a lower court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:41 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
Supreme Court in Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:25 am by Adam Feldman
The shortest first-day signed majority opinion over this period was the court’s 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm by David Gans
First, the majority held that the “undue burden” standard announced in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]