Search for: "State v. Newsom"
Results 541 - 560
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
In the interim, the Chief Justice before whom we argued (disclosure, I was counsel and did the oral argument in the first of that morning's cases, State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
O’Bannon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
The February 8, 2010 opinion in Keller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
The parties disputed whether this case should be evaluated under Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:06 pm
Newsome, 35 M.J. 749, 751 (N.M.C.M.R. 1992), aff'd, 38 M.J. 464 (C.M.A. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
In its appeal (Campaign for California Families v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 6:07 am
This decision, in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Holding that a state donor insemination statute must be construed to allow the former lesbian partner of a woman who conceived two children during their relationship to seek a legal determination of parental rights, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled in Shineovich v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 6:18 am
Newsome v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
Newsome, 352 So.2d 918, 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:12 pm
Newsome v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:56 am
At issue in the case of FCC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
