Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 541 - 560 of 29,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  One would expect, then, that California would have much worse results than other states, and that is exactly what we see.What is Governor Brown's plan? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:38 am by sally
Regina (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2012] EWHC 46 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 16 “Following the grant of a consent under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) in respect of any operation or change of use that constituted development, a direction made by the Secretary of State under section 90(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that planning permission for that and any… [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
Saint James Antiochian Orthodox Church v Town of Hyde Park, 2015 WL 5827160 (NYAD 2 Dept. 10/7/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Spirit of Aloha Temple v County of Maui and Maui Planning Commission, 2016 WL 347298 (D. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justices turned down opposing petitions, by state officials in 12-1039, and by Planned Parenthood-Indiana in 12-1159. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
"       The Oklahoma Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, issued a statement in response to the order saying, "This is a significant victory for the State of Oklahoma, and it temporarily prevents the EPA from enforcing a federal plan that will raise utility rates for Oklahoma consumers. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Subchapter V Confirmation Requirements Check out this discussion of the Subchapter V plan confirmation process. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 3:52 am by Kellie McTammany
If you were in a legal union before marriage was an option, you are subject to the patchwork of prior state laws that can have unintended consequences for new estate planning. [read post]