Search for: "State v. Priest"
Results 541 - 560
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Sexual favoritism which becomes pervasive to the extent of creating a hostile work environment [Priest v Rotary, 634 FSupp 571].See, also, Fella v County of Rockland, 297 A.D.2d 813, where the court, citing DeCintio, explained that there is no sexual discrimination or harassment involved "where the conduct complained of by the employee involves an isolated act of preferential treatment of another employee due to a romantic, consensual relationship. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
Supreme Court case law states that "the guarantee of free exercise is not limited to beliefs which are shared by all of the members of a religious sect. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:49 am
V establishes an indiscriminate data retention obligation, which unjustifiably infringes on the right to privacy and the presumption of innocence. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
→ A construct to justify discipline: “The entire old psychology, the psychology of will, was conditioned by the fact that its originators, the priests at the head of ancient communities, wanted to create for themselv [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
It seems, somehow, to be a core value for the practice of law, the kind of guild secret that keeps lawyers in the company of physicians and priests. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Priest? [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
But Tuesday’s case, Ramirez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:06 pm
His mother has said that as a child, he “was constantly around priests and nuns and brothers. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
Collaborative collectingNeed to share info about coll. stuffServices: moving from cathedral to bazaar modelYoung ppl and fac work in bazaar model – we need to be bazaar guides instead of high priests Questions Q for JP: HLSL in ten years? [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:01 pm
As a practical matter, we know that the Supreme Court is not about to say that states can no longer attribute legal significance to marriages performed by priests or ministers who only officiate at opposite-sex weddings, much less to marriages performed by rabbis (or ministers, priests, or imams) who only officiate at intrafaith weddings. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
In the case of Beer, et al., v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 2:41 pm
(Pix CiberCuba Jan 1, 2017)For the last five years I have written of the annual letter of the Cuban Council of the High Priests of Ifá (Consejo Cubano De Sacerdotes Mayores De Ifá), the practitioners of traditional religion brought over from West Africa with the slave trade and now naturalized as a powerful indigenous religion throughout the Caribbean and growing in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Burwell, 15-105; Priests for Life v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
Ct. 1979); O’Reilly v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
The 2003 Ex Post Facto Decision in Stogner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
The key reasoning of the new decision, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
That was the result the Court overturned in Sackett, et al., v. [read post]
